🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking followers viewing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of commenters applauding your advice on growing your venture? Are headhunters making contact to explore opportunities?

If not, the explanation might be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Modifying Profile Gender for Increased Reach

Dozens of female professionals joined a collective LinkedIn experiment this week following popular discussions indicated that switching their profile gender to "male" boosted their platform visibility.

Other testers rewrote their profiles to incorporate what they called "bro-coded" language - adding action-focused professional jargon like "propel", "transform" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their exposure also improved.

Systemic Preference Concerns Raised

The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether an inherent gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes men who employ professional networking terminology.

Like most major social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to decide which posts appear to which users - boosting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

Through a blog post, LinkedIn recognized the phenomenon but stated it does not factor in "demographic information" when deciding content distribution. Rather, the company explained that "numerous factors" affect how posts perform.

Modifying profile gender in your settings does not influence how your content shows up in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who modified her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her name to "Simon E", reported remarkable outcomes.

"The statistics I'm seeing indicate a 1,600% increase in profile views and a 1,300% increase in content views," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, began experimenting after observing her audience decline significantly.

The Method

• First, she modified her profile gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her profile using "male-coded" wording
• Finally, she repurposed old posts with comparable "agentic" language

The outcome was instantaneous: a 415% increase in reach within one week.

The Downside

Despite the success, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the approach.

"Previously, my posts were more personal - concise and clever, but also warm and human," she stated. "Currently, the bro-coded version was forceful and confident - like a white male being overly confident."

She discontinued the test after one week, stating "Every day I continued, and results got better, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Not all participants experienced favorable results. One writer who modified both her gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "white" described a decrease in reach and interaction.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it operates in particular situations or why," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These experiments coincide with ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a professional network and community site.

Recent changes in the past few months have apparently resulted in female creators experiencing markedly lower visibility, leading to informal experiments where identical content by male and female users received dramatically unequal audience engagement.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to classify and spread posts based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it frequently assesses its systems, including "examinations of inequalities based on gender."

Company representative proposed that recent declines in certain members' visibility might stem from higher volume due to additional posts on the platform.

Evolving Environment

As one participant observed, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she remarked. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly competitive and unpredictable."