🔗 Share this article

Picture this: a smiling the Danish striker wearing Napoli's colors. Now, juxtapose that with a sad-looking the Slovenian forward in a Manchester United kit, looking as if he just missed a sitter. Don't worry finding a real picture of that miss; background information is the enemy. Now, add statistics in a big, silly font. Remember some emoticons. Share it everywhere.

Will you mention that Højlund's goal count includes scores in the Champions League while his counterpart isn't playing in Europe? Certainly not. Nor will you note that four of the Dane's goals came against Belarus and Greece, or that Denmark is far superior to Sesko's Slovenia and generates far more chances. If you run online for a large outlet, pure interaction is what pays the bills, United are the biggest draw, and nuance is the thing to avoid.

So the wheel of online material turns. Your next task is to scan a 44-minute interview featuring Peter Schmeichel and extract the part where he calls the signing of Sesko "weird". There's a bit, where Schmeichel prefaces his comments by saying, "I have nothing bad to say about Benjamin Sesko"... well, remove that part. Nobody needs that. Just ensure "strange" and "Sesko" are paired in the title. People will be outraged.

The Season of Potential and Premature Judgment

The heart of fall has long been one of my favourite times to watch football. The leaves swirl, the wind turns, the teams and tactics are newly formed, all is novel and yet everything is beginning to form. Key players of the season ahead are staking their claims. The summer market is shut. Nobody is mentioning the multiple trophies yet. Everyone are still in the game. At this precise point, anything is possible.

Yet, for similar reasons, mid-autumn has also been one of my least favourite times to read about football. For while nothing has yet been settled, opinions must be formed immediately. The City winger is resurgent. Florian Wirtz has been a crushing disappointment. Could Semenyo be the best player in the league at this moment? Please an answer now.

Sesko as The Prime Example

And for numerous reasons, Sesko feels like the archetype in this context, a player inextricably trapped between football's opposing, unavoidable forces. The need to delay definitive judgment, to let technical development and strategic understanding to develop. And the demand to produce instant definitive judgment, a constant stream of opinions and memes, out-of-context condemnations and meaningless comparisons, a square that can never truly be circled.

It is not my aim to offer a in-depth analysis of Sesko's time at Manchester United to date. The guy has been in the lineup four times in the Premier League in a wildly inconsistent team, scored two goals, and had a mere of 116 touches. What exactly are we evaluating? And do I propose to duplicate the pundits' notable debate "Argument Over Benjamin Sesko", in which two famous analysts duel thrillingly on a popular show over whether Sesko needs 10 goals to be a success this season (Neville), or whether it is more like 12 or 13 (Wright).

A Cruel Environment

Despite this I loved watching him at Leipzig: a powerful, screeching sports car of a striker, playing in a team ideally suited to his talents: given the license to rampage but also the freedom to miss. And in part this is why Manchester United feels like the most unforgiving place he could possibly be right now: a place where "harsh judgments" are handed down in roughly the duration it takes to watch a short advertisement, the club with the widest and most pitiless gulf between the time and air he requires, and the opportunity he is going to get.

We saw an example of this during the national team pause, when a viral chart handily stated that Sesko had been deemed – decisively – the poorest acquisition of the recent market by a poll of football representatives. Naturally, the media are by no means alone in such behavior. Club channels, influencers, anonymous X accounts with a suspiciously high number of fake followers: everybody with a vested interest is now basically aligned along the same principles, an environment explicitly geared for provocation.

The Psychological Toll

Endless scrolling and tapping. What is happening to ourselves? Are we aware, on any level, what this infinite sluice of aggravation is doing to our minds? Quite apart from the inherent strangeness of playing in the center of it all, knowing on a bizarre butterfly-effect level that every single thing about players is now basically content, commodity, public property to be packaged and traded.

And yes, partly this is because United are United, the entity that continues to feed the narrative, a major institution that must always be generating the strong emotions. However, partly this is a temporary malaise, a pendulum of judgment most clearly and cruelly glimpsed at this time of year, roughly four weeks after the transfer market shut. Throughout the summer we have been desiring players, eulogising them, salivating over them. Now, just a few weeks in, a lot of those same players are now being disdained as failures. Should we start to be concerned about Jamie Gittens? Did Arsenal actually need Viktor Gyökeres wise? What was the purpose of Randal Kolo Muani?

A Wider Issue

It feels appropriate that he faces Liverpool on Sunday: a team simultaneously 13 months unbeaten at their stadium in the Premier League and somehow in their own situation of perceived turmoil, like submitting a missing person’s report on a person who popped to the store half an hour ago. Too open. Their star past his prime. Alexander Isak waste of money. The coach losing his hair.

Perhaps we have not yet quite grasped the way the narrative of football has begun to supplant football itself, to influence the way we view it, an whole competition repivoted around discussion topics and immediate responses, an activity that happens in the backdrop while we browse through our phones, incapable to detach from the constant flow of takes and further hot takes. Perhaps this player taking the hit right now. However, we're all sacrificing something here.